AIgree
← back

AWS vs Google Cloud

Side-by-side comparison of the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy of AWS and Google Cloud.

AWS logo
AWS
Cloud
★★★☆☆
Mixed

AWS offers solid privacy-rights language and clear operational disclosures, but its terms place substantial responsibility on customers, include strict beta and prepaid-service limits, and allow significant data collection and sharing. The result is a competent but not especially user-friendly legal posture.

AWS’s legal terms are generally business-oriented and detailed, with strong emphasis on compliance, customer responsibility, and service-specific documentation. The privacy notice is comparatively robust on user rights, security measures, portability, and non-sale of personal information in the U.S., but it also allows broad collection, sharing with providers and advertising partners, and retention after account closure for legal and operational reasons.

Points of interest

  • negative ●●●●● terms
    Beta services are risky

    Beta and preview services come with no service-level agreements, can change at any time, and may be suspended or terminated without notice. AWS also says content used in beta may be deleted or inaccessible after termination.

  • negative ●●●●○ terms
    Customer bears compliance duties

    You must ensure your own use, content, and downstream users comply with AWS rules and applicable law. That means privacy notices, consents, software licenses, and content moderation obligations can fall on you rather than AWS.

  • negative ●●●●○ terms
    Fast content takedown window

    If AWS flags content as prohibited, you generally have only two business days to remove or disable access before AWS can do it for you or suspend the service. In some cases AWS can remove content immediately without notice.

  • negative ●●●●○ terms
    Many prepaid plans nonrefundable

    Reserved Instances, Savings Plans, Dedicated Hosts, and Capacity Blocks are generally noncancellable and nonrefundable. If you commit to these products, your money is largely locked in unless a narrow AWS-triggered refund scenario applies.

  • positive ●●●●○ terms
    Deletion after account closure

    AWS states it will delete your content after your account closes, which is a helpful baseline deletion commitment for user data stored on the service. The privacy notice also says personal information will be deleted under applicable law, though some records may remain for legal reasons.

  • positive ●●●●○ privacy
    Portability and access rights

    The privacy notice gives users rights to access, correct, delete, restrict, object, and request portability of personal information, subject to local law. That is a strong set of account-control rights compared with many enterprise services.

  • negative ●●●○○ terms
    AWS may delete inactive content

    AWS may delete your content after account closure, and some services may also remove inactive content after periods of non-use. This matters if you rely on AWS as a storage or archival location.

  • negative ●●●○○ privacy
    Broad data collection and sharing

    AWS collects information you provide, automatic usage data, and data from other sources, then shares it with service providers, marketplace sellers, and in business transfers. That creates a fairly expansive data ecosystem around your account activity.

  • positive ●●●○○ privacy
    No selling customer data

    For U.S. users, AWS says it is not in the business of selling customer personal information. That is a meaningful protection, even though AWS still shares data for service delivery, advertising, and other purposes.

  • positive ●●●○○ privacy
    Ad and cookie controls

    AWS lets you manage cookie preferences and opt out of certain targeted advertising through privacy choices and browser settings. This gives users some practical control over tracking and ad personalization.

Documents

Google Cloud logo
Google Cloud
Cloud
★★★☆☆
mixed

The legal posture is neither especially user-hostile nor especially privacy-minimizing. It offers meaningful account controls and data export/deletion tools, but collection, cross-service use, and retention remain broad, and dispute/venue terms favor Google’s home jurisdiction.

Google Cloud’s terms are fairly standard for enterprise cloud services, with California law and Santa Clara County venue for most customers, written-consent assignment limits, and Google allowed to subcontract while staying liable. The privacy policy is comparatively transparent and gives users/exporters several control tools, but it also describes broad data collection, cross-service linking, some cookie-based tracking, and retention that varies by data type and settings. Managed organization accounts can be heavily controlled by administrators.

Points of interest

  • negative ●●●●○ privacy
    Extensive data collection

    Google collects content, device/browser data, activity, location, and partner/public-source information. For users seeking minimal collection, this is a broad-collection model rather than a narrow service-specific one.

  • positive ●●●●○ privacy
    Export and delete tools

    The policy explicitly says you can review, manage, export, and delete data through account tools. That gives users practical control over account contents and supports portability.

  • negative ●●●○○ terms
    California venue for disputes

    Most non-government customers must litigate claims in Santa Clara County, California under California law. That can make disputes more expensive and inconvenient for users outside that area.

  • negative ●●●○○ privacy
    Retention varies and can persist

    Retention periods differ by data type; some data stays until you delete it, and some is kept longer for business or legal reasons. Backup deletion may also be delayed, so deletion is not always immediate.

  • negative ●●●○○ privacy
    Admins can access user data

    If the account is managed by an organization, administrators may access stored data, change passwords, restrict settings, and suspend access. Users of workplace or school accounts should expect reduced privacy and control.

  • positive ●●●○○ privacy
    No broad sharing outside Google

    Google says it does not share personal information outside Google without consent except for administrators, service providers, legal reasons, or business transfers. That is a meaningful disclosure of the main exceptions.

  • negative ●●○○○ privacy
    Broad cross-service data linking

    Google says it may link data across its services and devices, including activity from third-party sites and apps using Google services. This can reduce compartmentalization between products and increase profiling.

  • neutral ●●○○○ terms
    Email notice counts as received

    Official notices are handled by email, and they are treated as received when sent. Users need to keep the notification email address current or risk missing legally important communications.

  • positive ●●○○○ privacy
    EU rights are spelled out

    For EU/UK users, Google expressly lists access, update, removal, restriction, objection, and export rights. That is a useful rights summary, even though it applies only where those laws cover the processing.

Documents

Comparison is based on each service's published Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Read the source documents linked above before relying on any specific clause.