Medium vs Substack
Side-by-side comparison of the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy of Medium and Substack.
Medium offers meaningful privacy controls, no-sale language, and relatively clear account data tools, but these are offset by broad tracking, international transfers, strong liability limits, account/content moderation discretion, and mandatory arbitration with a class action waiver unless you opt out within 30 days.
Medium’s policies are fairly standard for a publishing platform: it collects account, activity, device, and tracking data; shares data with vendors, affiliates, and in legal or business-transfer contexts; and requires arbitration for most disputes unless you opt out quickly. On the positive side, it says it does not sell personal information, offers account access/correction/export/deletion tools, provides some legal-process notice, and states a 14-day deletion timeline for closed accounts in covered regions.
Points of interest
-
negative ●●●●● termsMandatory arbitration waiver
Most disputes must go to individual binding arbitration, and you waive class actions unless you opt out within 30 days. This makes it harder to sue in court or join with other users over small-value claims.
-
negative ●●●●○ termsLow liability cap
If Medium harms you, its financial exposure is heavily limited. Most claims are capped at the greater of $50 or the amount you paid, which can leave users undercompensated.
-
positive ●●●●○ privacyNo sale of data
Medium expressly says it does not sell personal information. That is a meaningful privacy protection compared with services that monetize user data through sale or sharing arrangements.
-
positive ●●●●○ privacyAccess, export, delete tools
Users can access, correct, delete, and export account information through Settings. Self-service controls make it easier to leave the service or review what Medium holds about you.
-
negative ●●●○○ termsBroad content license
You keep ownership of what you post, but you grant Medium a worldwide, sublicensable, royalty-free license to use and display it within the service. That is common for hosting platforms, but still gives Medium broad operational rights over your content.
-
negative ●●●○○ termsTermination at any time
Medium may remove content or suspend or terminate accounts at its discretion. For users who rely on the platform, that creates platform-dependence risk with limited recourse.
-
negative ●●●○○ privacyExtensive tracking and profiling
Medium tracks reading history, clicks, device data, and uses cookies plus third-party analytics to analyze behavior and target content to your interests. This means substantial behavioral monitoring beyond simple account operation.
-
positive ●●●○○ privacy14-day account deletion
For covered users, Medium says closed-account data will be deleted within 14 days. A specific deletion timeline is more user-friendly than an open-ended retention promise.
-
positive ●●●○○ privacyNotice of legal requests
Medium says it will notify you about legal-process disclosures so you can challenge them, unless prohibited or safety concerns apply. It also says it will object to improper requests.
-
negative ●●○○○ privacyInternational data transfers
Your information may be processed in the United States and other countries where protections may differ from your home jurisdiction. This can reduce practical control or change the legal safeguards that apply.
-
negative ●●○○○ privacyEmbedded third-party sharing
Third-party embeds on Medium pages can send those companies information about your activity as if you visited them directly. Medium says it does not control what those third parties collect through embeds.
Documents
Substack provides meaningful privacy rights and some clear disclosures, but the combination of broad data collection/sharing, cross-site tracking without Do Not Track support, broad content licensing, discretionary account termination, and mandatory arbitration makes the overall posture more company-favoring than user-favoring.
Substack’s legal terms are mixed. It offers useful privacy rights, self-service account deletion, and some transparency around data use and international transfers. But it also collects a broad range of personal data, allows tracking across websites, gives creators access to subscriber information, requires individual arbitration with a class-action waiver, and takes a perpetual irrevocable license to user content.
Points of interest
-
negative ●●●●○ termsMandatory arbitration waiver
Most disputes must be resolved through individual arbitration in San Francisco County, and users waive the ability to bring class or representative actions. This can make claims harder and more expensive to pursue.
-
negative ●●●●○ termsPerpetual content license
You keep ownership of your posts, but Substack gets a royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide license to use and distribute them. That means rights you grant do not end just because you leave the platform.
-
negative ●●●●○ privacyBroad data collection
Substack collects extensive information including payment data, device and IP data, location, social account info, subscription status, and direct message contents and metadata. This creates a fairly comprehensive profile of users.
-
negative ●●●●○ privacyTracking after you leave
Substack says it may collect information about your online activity after you leave its website, and it does not honor Do Not Track signals. Users who want minimal tracking may find this intrusive.
-
positive ●●●●○ privacyStrong privacy rights listed
Substack says users may request access, correction, deletion, restriction, portability, and objection to some processing. It also commits to responding within one month, with limited extensions.
-
negative ●●●○○ termsCan remove content anytime
Substack can remove content or suspend accounts at its sole discretion, sometimes without notice. Users may have limited recourse if moderation or enforcement decisions affect their publication.
-
negative ●●●○○ termsPublic posts may persist
Deleting your account does not guarantee full removal of public posts or backup copies. Content may also remain visible if others copied or stored it.
-
negative ●●●○○ privacyCreators get subscriber data
When you subscribe to a publication, Substack shares your name and email with that creator, and creators govern their own downstream privacy practices. Your data protections may therefore vary by publication.
-
negative ●●●○○ privacyDirect messages not encrypted
Substack direct messages are not end-to-end encrypted, and staff may access them for safety, support, or enforcement purposes. Recipients may also keep messages even if you delete them or your account.
-
positive ●●●○○ privacySelf-service deletion tools
Users can access, edit, or delete some profile information through account settings, and can delete their account from the account page. This gives users practical control without requiring manual support contact.
-
positive ●●○○○ privacyMarketing opt-out available
Substack says marketing messages are consent-based where required and can be unsubscribed from at any time. This limits unwanted promotional communications.
-
positive ●●○○○ privacyMaterial change notice
Substack says it will alert users to material changes to the privacy policy and terms by site notice, email, or other means. That is more transparent than silent updates.
Documents
Comparison is based on each service's published Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Read the source documents linked above before relying on any specific clause.