AIgree
← back

Midjourney vs Claude

Side-by-side comparison of the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy of Midjourney and Claude.

Midjourney logo
★★☆☆☆
Company-protective

Users get some meaningful privacy rights and a clear deletion/access path, but the service combines broad content licensing, mandatory arbitration, unilateral policy changes, public-by-default sharing, and substantial data sharing/retention.

Midjourney’s legal terms are fairly standard for an AI generation service but are strongly company-protective in several areas. Users retain ownership of their creations to the extent allowed by law, yet Midjourney gets a broad, perpetual license to use inputs and outputs, defaults public sharing/remixing on, and requires binding arbitration in California. The privacy policy is more user-friendly on deletion and access rights, with clear account-based request flows and explicit non-sale language, though it still collects prompts, uploads, usage data, and shares data with advertisers and service providers.

Points of interest

  • negative ●●●●● terms
    Broad perpetual content license

    Midjourney can use, modify, sublicense, and distribute your prompts and generated assets forever, even after you leave. That means your content may be reused for service, product, or downstream purposes without additional payment or permission.

  • negative ●●●●○ terms
    Public sharing by default

    Content you post is publicly viewable and remixable unless you use the limited Stealth feature. In shared spaces like Discord, other people can still see your creations regardless of Stealth.

  • negative ●●●●○ terms
    Mandatory arbitration clause

    Disputes must go to binding arbitration in Santa Clara County, and you waive the right to a jury trial. This can make it harder and more expensive to bring claims in court.

  • negative ●●●●○ terms
    Can change terms unilaterally

    Midjourney can update the agreement and keep the service terms changing over time, with continued use treated as acceptance. If you disagree, your only real option is to stop using the service.

  • negative ●●●●○ terms
    Suspension at any time

    The company can suspend or ban access at any time and for any reason. That creates a significant account-risk if your work depends on continuous access.

  • positive ●●●●○ privacy
    No card storage stated

    Midjourney says it uses third-party processors and does not store your credit card information, only confirmation that payment was made. That reduces the amount of sensitive payment data kept directly by Midjourney.

  • negative ●●●○○ privacy
    Data shared with advertisers

    Midjourney says it may use analytics and advertising partners and advertising cookies to deliver more relevant ads. Users can opt out of certain sharing in privacy settings, but the default collection/sharing posture is still fairly broad.

  • negative ●●●○○ privacy
    Prompt and upload collection

    The service collects prompts, uploaded content, IP address, cookies, usage data, and contact details. For an AI tool, that means the things you type and upload may become part of the service’s retained personal data footprint.

  • negative ●●●○○ privacy
    Long retention for disputes

    Personal data is kept as long as needed for the stated purposes, legal compliance, disputes, and enforcement. In practice, that means information may linger well beyond account use if Midjourney decides it is needed for legal or policy reasons.

  • neutral ●●●○○ privacy
    Some deletion and access rights

    EEA, UK, Swiss, and California users have access, correction, deletion, portability, and some objection/opt-out rights. The practical upside is a usable account-based path to request account/data deletion.

  • positive ●●●○○ privacy
    Deletion via account page

    The policy gives a concrete path to delete your account and data through the account page, and says survey data can also be accessed and deleted. That makes rights requests more actionable than vague contact-only promises.

Documents

Claude logo
Claude
AI
★★★☆☆
mixed

The service offers meaningful privacy rights, deletion tools, data portability, and no sale of personal data. However, it also collects substantial technical and content data, uses inputs/outputs for model training by default unless opted out, auto-renews subscriptions, and reserves broad termination and liability limits.

Claude is an AI chat and productivity service with consumer terms for EEA/Switzerland users and a detailed privacy policy. The legal posture is moderately user-friendly on privacy rights and local dispute options, but it includes automatic subscription renewal, broad model-training use of user content unless opted out, extensive third-party sharing for integrations, and strong liability and account-termination limits.

Points of interest

  • negative ●●●●○ terms
    Inputs used for training

    Anthropic may use your Inputs, Outputs, and feedback to improve services and train models unless you opt out in account settings. Even after opting out, flagged conversations and explicit feedback can still be used for model training and safety review.

  • negative ●●●●○ terms
    Auto-renewing subscriptions

    Paid subscriptions renew automatically unless you cancel at least 24 hours before the end of the current term. This can create surprise charges if you forget to cancel on time, and cancellation generally does not trigger a refund for the current term.

  • negative ●●●●○ privacy
    Broad third-party sharing

    Anthropic shares data with affiliates, service providers, administrators for enterprise-linked accounts, and integrations you connect. If you use third-party services, Claude may send Inputs, Outputs, and instructions directly to those services, which then handle the data under their own policies.

  • negative ●●●●○ terms
    Broad liability disclaimer

    The service is provided 'as is' and Anthropic disclaims warranties for accuracy, reliability, security, privacy, and availability. Practically, this limits your leverage if the AI gives bad outputs or the service misbehaves.

  • positive ●●●●○ terms
    Data portability and switching

    You can ask to port exportable data and digital assets or switch providers, which is a strong exit right for a consumer AI service. The terms also say Anthropic will assist with switching and erase exportable data after the process, subject to legal retention requirements.

  • positive ●●●●○ privacy
    Deletion and conversation removal

    The privacy policy says you can delete individual conversations immediately from history, with back-end deletion within 30 days, and you can also request deletion of personal data collected through the service. That gives users a relatively clear deletion path compared with many AI services.

  • negative ●●●○○ terms
    Account deletion on termination

    Anthropic can suspend or terminate access for breach, legal compliance, security needs, or inactivity, and may delete Materials or other account data when the relationship ends. That means user content may be lost if the account is closed or terminated.

  • positive ●●●○○ privacy
    No sale of personal data

    Anthropic states it does not sell personal data, and it honors global privacy controls for opting out of targeted advertising use of your data. This reduces a major privacy risk, though it does not stop sharing with service providers and integrations.

  • positive ●●●○○ terms
    Local courts available

    Disputes are governed by Irish law, but EEA and Swiss consumers may also bring claims in their local courts. That is better than an exclusive far-away forum and preserves practical access to remedies for covered users.

  • neutral ●●○○○ privacy
    No child collection

    Anthropic says the service is not directed to children under 18 and it does not knowingly collect, use, disclose, sell, or share their information. That is a standard but useful baseline privacy safeguard.

Documents

Comparison is based on each service's published Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Read the source documents linked above before relying on any specific clause.