AIgree
← back

Revolut vs Monzo

Side-by-side comparison of the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy of Revolut and Monzo.

Revolut logo
Revolut
Finance
★★★☆☆
Mixed / average user-friendliness

Revolut offers notable transparency, in-app controls, privacy rights, and external complaint avenues, but these are offset by broad data collection, long retention, extensive sharing, automated account decisions, and liability limits typical of regulated fintech services.

Revolut’s legal terms are fairly detailed and include meaningful user controls like data access, portability, deletion requests, complaint escalation to the Financial Ombudsman Service, and human review of significant automated decisions. At the same time, it collects extensive financial and device data, shares data broadly to run a regulated finance service, retains data for long periods, limits liability in many payment-error scenarios, and relies heavily on fraud/AML-related restrictions and automated decisioning.

Points of interest

  • negative ●●●●○ privacy
    Extensive data collection

    Revolut collects broad categories of personal data including IDs, financial details, device data, location, contacts, biometrics, behavioral signals, and inferred profiles. This creates a detailed picture of your finances and app use.

  • negative ●●●●○ privacy
    Automated account restrictions

    Revolut may use automated systems, including AI, to open accounts, detect fraud, and lock, restrict, or close accounts. In practice, users may face sudden service interruptions pending review.

  • positive ●●●●○ privacy
    No sale of personal data

    Revolut expressly says it will not sell your personal data. That is a meaningful privacy commitment compared with many consumer platforms.

  • positive ●●●●○ privacy
    Strong privacy rights

    Users can access, correct, delete, restrict, object, withdraw consent, and request transfer of certain data. Practical controls are available in-app or by email.

  • negative ●●●○○ privacy
    Long data retention

    Personal data may be kept for long periods after the relationship ends, and some fraud-related records may be retained even longer. Deletion requests may therefore only be partially honored.

  • negative ●●●○○ privacy
    Broad data sharing

    Revolut shares data within its group and with service providers, payment networks, credit agencies, partners, authorities, and payment counterparties. Some recipients of your payments will receive identifying details like your name and IBAN.

  • negative ●●●○○ terms
    Limited payment-error liability

    If you enter the wrong account details or pay the wrong person, Revolut generally is not responsible and only says it will try to help recover funds. Users bear much of the risk of payment mistakes.

  • positive ●●●○○ privacy
    Human review of AI decisions

    If an automated decision significantly affects you, you can ask for manual review and challenge the result. This matters because account opening, fraud checks, restrictions, closures, and credit decisions may be automated.

  • positive ●●●○○ terms
    Ombudsman complaint route

    If you cannot resolve a complaint with Revolut, you may escalate to the Financial Ombudsman Service. This gives users an external dispute option beyond dealing only with the company.

  • positive ●●●○○ terms
    Download account history

    You can download your payment and account information from the app while your account is active. That supports record-keeping and practical portability.

  • negative ●●○○○ terms
    Court venue fixed

    The terms say English law applies and court claims must be brought in England and Wales. That may make court action less convenient for some users, though it does not waive the right to complain to the Ombudsman.

  • neutral ●●○○○ terms
    Funds safeguarded, not FSCS

    Customer money is held as safeguarded e-money in segregated accounts or low-risk assets, which offers insolvency protection mechanics. But it is not covered by the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme.

Documents

Monzo logo
Monzo
Finance
★★★★☆
Generally user-friendly

Monzo avoids some harsh consumer-contract terms like mandatory arbitration and class-action waivers, offers refund protections and regulatory complaint routes, and provides meaningful privacy rights. Its weaker points are extensive data use for marketing/analytics, 10-year retention, automated decisions, and broad operational discretion in payments, closures, and term changes.

Monzo’s legal terms are relatively consumer-friendly for a UK bank: deposits are FSCS-protected, disputes stay in English courts, and it offers clear complaint routes plus privacy rights like access, deletion, and portability. The main tradeoffs are broad data collection and sharing, long retention, automated decision-making, and Monzo’s ability to change terms and recover debts from balances across accounts/Pots.

Points of interest

  • positive ●●●●● terms
    FSCS deposit protection

    Eligible deposits are protected by the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme, which is a strong consumer safeguard if the bank fails. This is a major benefit compared with many non-bank fintech services.

  • negative ●●●●○ privacy
    Broad data collection

    Monzo collects extensive identity, financial, transaction, device, location, support, and communication data, plus information from outside sources like credit agencies. For users, this means a high-surveillance banking profile rather than minimal data use.

  • negative ●●●●○ privacy
    Marketing and ad sharing

    The privacy notice allows use of your data for tailored marketing and sharing limited data with social media, analytics, and advertising providers. Even if some controls exist, this goes beyond strictly necessary banking uses.

  • negative ●●●●○ privacy
    Long retention period

    Customer data is generally kept for 10 years after account closure, with possible longer retention for fraud or legal reasons. That is a long post-closure retention window for personal financial data.

  • positive ●●●●○ terms
    Court and ombudsman access

    Disputes go to English courts, and customers may also be able to complain to the Financial Ombudsman Service. That means no forced arbitration clause blocking normal legal or regulatory remedies.

  • positive ●●●●○ terms
    Refund protections offered

    Monzo says it will usually refund unauthorized payments, Direct Debit errors, some card issues, and eligible APP fraud claims. This gives users meaningful payment protection beyond many ordinary app services.

  • positive ●●●●○ privacy
    Human review available

    If a solely automated decision significantly affects you, Monzo says you can request a manual review and challenge the outcome. This is an important user protection against opaque automated decisions.

  • positive ●●●●○ privacy
    Strong privacy rights

    Users get rights to access, correction, deletion, restriction, objection, consent withdrawal, portability, and ICO complaint. These are meaningful privacy controls and are clearly stated.

  • negative ●●●○○ privacy
    Automated decisions used

    Monzo uses automated decision-making for account eligibility, fraud controls, marketing suitability, and some disputes. Although human review is available for significant decisions, automation can still affect access to services or account activity.

  • negative ●●●○○ terms
    Monzo can change terms

    Monzo can change charges, rates, and terms, including introducing new charges, with notice periods depending on the change. Users can leave if they disagree, but the contract still gives Monzo broad amendment power.

  • negative ●●●○○ terms
    Debt set-off rights

    If you owe Monzo money, it can take funds from your current account, Pots, or savings balances to cover the debt. In practice, money set aside for budgeting may still be used for repayment.

  • negative ●●●○○ terms
    Immediate account closure possible

    Monzo may close or restrict accounts immediately for breaches, legal risk, false information, ineligibility, or abusive conduct. This gives the bank significant discretion to cut off access without advance notice in some cases.

Documents

Comparison is based on each service's published Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Read the source documents linked above before relying on any specific clause.