Revolut vs Monzo
Side-by-side comparison of the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy of Revolut and Monzo.
Revolut offers notable transparency, in-app controls, privacy rights, and external complaint avenues, but these are offset by broad data collection, long retention, extensive sharing, automated account decisions, and liability limits typical of regulated fintech services.
Revolut’s legal terms are fairly detailed and include meaningful user controls like data access, portability, deletion requests, complaint escalation to the Financial Ombudsman Service, and human review of significant automated decisions. At the same time, it collects extensive financial and device data, shares data broadly to run a regulated finance service, retains data for long periods, limits liability in many payment-error scenarios, and relies heavily on fraud/AML-related restrictions and automated decisioning.
Points of interest
-
negative ●●●●○ privacyExtensive data collection
Revolut collects broad categories of personal data including IDs, financial details, device data, location, contacts, biometrics, behavioral signals, and inferred profiles. This creates a detailed picture of your finances and app use.
-
negative ●●●●○ privacyAutomated account restrictions
Revolut may use automated systems, including AI, to open accounts, detect fraud, and lock, restrict, or close accounts. In practice, users may face sudden service interruptions pending review.
-
positive ●●●●○ privacyNo sale of personal data
Revolut expressly says it will not sell your personal data. That is a meaningful privacy commitment compared with many consumer platforms.
-
positive ●●●●○ privacyStrong privacy rights
Users can access, correct, delete, restrict, object, withdraw consent, and request transfer of certain data. Practical controls are available in-app or by email.
-
negative ●●●○○ privacyLong data retention
Personal data may be kept for long periods after the relationship ends, and some fraud-related records may be retained even longer. Deletion requests may therefore only be partially honored.
-
negative ●●●○○ privacyBroad data sharing
Revolut shares data within its group and with service providers, payment networks, credit agencies, partners, authorities, and payment counterparties. Some recipients of your payments will receive identifying details like your name and IBAN.
-
negative ●●●○○ termsLimited payment-error liability
If you enter the wrong account details or pay the wrong person, Revolut generally is not responsible and only says it will try to help recover funds. Users bear much of the risk of payment mistakes.
-
positive ●●●○○ privacyHuman review of AI decisions
If an automated decision significantly affects you, you can ask for manual review and challenge the result. This matters because account opening, fraud checks, restrictions, closures, and credit decisions may be automated.
-
positive ●●●○○ termsOmbudsman complaint route
If you cannot resolve a complaint with Revolut, you may escalate to the Financial Ombudsman Service. This gives users an external dispute option beyond dealing only with the company.
-
positive ●●●○○ termsDownload account history
You can download your payment and account information from the app while your account is active. That supports record-keeping and practical portability.
-
negative ●●○○○ termsCourt venue fixed
The terms say English law applies and court claims must be brought in England and Wales. That may make court action less convenient for some users, though it does not waive the right to complain to the Ombudsman.
-
neutral ●●○○○ termsFunds safeguarded, not FSCS
Customer money is held as safeguarded e-money in segregated accounts or low-risk assets, which offers insolvency protection mechanics. But it is not covered by the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme.
Documents
Monzo avoids some harsh consumer-contract terms like mandatory arbitration and class-action waivers, offers refund protections and regulatory complaint routes, and provides meaningful privacy rights. Its weaker points are extensive data use for marketing/analytics, 10-year retention, automated decisions, and broad operational discretion in payments, closures, and term changes.
Monzo’s legal terms are relatively consumer-friendly for a UK bank: deposits are FSCS-protected, disputes stay in English courts, and it offers clear complaint routes plus privacy rights like access, deletion, and portability. The main tradeoffs are broad data collection and sharing, long retention, automated decision-making, and Monzo’s ability to change terms and recover debts from balances across accounts/Pots.
Points of interest
-
positive ●●●●● termsFSCS deposit protection
Eligible deposits are protected by the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme, which is a strong consumer safeguard if the bank fails. This is a major benefit compared with many non-bank fintech services.
-
negative ●●●●○ privacyBroad data collection
Monzo collects extensive identity, financial, transaction, device, location, support, and communication data, plus information from outside sources like credit agencies. For users, this means a high-surveillance banking profile rather than minimal data use.
-
negative ●●●●○ privacyMarketing and ad sharing
The privacy notice allows use of your data for tailored marketing and sharing limited data with social media, analytics, and advertising providers. Even if some controls exist, this goes beyond strictly necessary banking uses.
-
negative ●●●●○ privacyLong retention period
Customer data is generally kept for 10 years after account closure, with possible longer retention for fraud or legal reasons. That is a long post-closure retention window for personal financial data.
-
positive ●●●●○ termsCourt and ombudsman access
Disputes go to English courts, and customers may also be able to complain to the Financial Ombudsman Service. That means no forced arbitration clause blocking normal legal or regulatory remedies.
-
positive ●●●●○ termsRefund protections offered
Monzo says it will usually refund unauthorized payments, Direct Debit errors, some card issues, and eligible APP fraud claims. This gives users meaningful payment protection beyond many ordinary app services.
-
positive ●●●●○ privacyHuman review available
If a solely automated decision significantly affects you, Monzo says you can request a manual review and challenge the outcome. This is an important user protection against opaque automated decisions.
-
positive ●●●●○ privacyStrong privacy rights
Users get rights to access, correction, deletion, restriction, objection, consent withdrawal, portability, and ICO complaint. These are meaningful privacy controls and are clearly stated.
-
negative ●●●○○ privacyAutomated decisions used
Monzo uses automated decision-making for account eligibility, fraud controls, marketing suitability, and some disputes. Although human review is available for significant decisions, automation can still affect access to services or account activity.
-
negative ●●●○○ termsMonzo can change terms
Monzo can change charges, rates, and terms, including introducing new charges, with notice periods depending on the change. Users can leave if they disagree, but the contract still gives Monzo broad amendment power.
-
negative ●●●○○ termsDebt set-off rights
If you owe Monzo money, it can take funds from your current account, Pots, or savings balances to cover the debt. In practice, money set aside for budgeting may still be used for repayment.
-
negative ●●●○○ termsImmediate account closure possible
Monzo may close or restrict accounts immediately for breaches, legal risk, false information, ineligibility, or abusive conduct. This gives the bank significant discretion to cut off access without advance notice in some cases.
Documents
Comparison is based on each service's published Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Read the source documents linked above before relying on any specific clause.