Substack vs Medium
Side-by-side comparison of the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy of Substack and Medium.
Substack offers meaningful privacy rights and self-service deletion/editing, and it says creators keep ownership of posts. But those benefits are outweighed by mandatory arbitration, class-action waiver, low liability cap, a perpetual irrevocable content license, broad account termination discretion, significant data collection/sharing, and cross-site tracking without Do Not Track support.
Substack’s legal terms are fairly standard for a publishing platform but tilt mixed-to-user-unfriendly in key areas. Users keep ownership of their content and get account-level access, correction, deletion, portability, and objection rights, but Substack takes a perpetual irrevocable content license, broad liability protections, arbitration with class-action waiver, broad sharing with creators/service providers, and allows tracking cookies including cross-site activity without honoring Do Not Track.
Points of interest
-
negative ●●●●● termsMandatory arbitration waiver
Most disputes must be resolved through individual arbitration in San Francisco County, and you waive class or representative actions. This makes collective claims and court litigation harder for users.
-
negative ●●●●● termsPerpetual content license
You keep ownership of your posts, but Substack gets a royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide license to use and distribute them. That license can continue even after you stop using the service.
-
negative ●●●●○ termsLow liability cap
If something goes wrong, Substack broadly disclaims warranties and caps most liability at the greater of $100 or what you paid in the prior 12 months. Users may have very limited practical recourse for losses.
-
negative ●●●●○ termsBroad termination discretion
Substack can suspend or terminate your account for any reason at its discretion, sometimes without notice. Public posts may also remain available after account deletion.
-
negative ●●●●○ privacyExtensive data sharing
Substack shares personal information with affiliates, creators, service providers, integrated third parties, buyers in a business transfer, and authorities when required. Creator interactions may also be governed by the creator’s own privacy practices rather than Substack’s.
-
negative ●●●●○ privacyCross-site tracking allowed
Substack says it may collect information about your online activity after you leave its site, and it does not honor Do Not Track signals. Users who want minimal tracking do not get that by default.
-
positive ●●●●○ privacyStrong privacy rights listed
Substack states that users may request access, correction, deletion, restriction, portability, and objection, and says it will respond within one month. These are meaningful user controls, especially for EEA/UK-style privacy rights.
-
negative ●●●○○ termsBroad indemnity obligation
You may have to cover Substack’s costs, damages, and attorneys’ fees for third-party claims tied to your use of the platform or violations of the terms. This can shift substantial legal risk onto users.
-
negative ●●●○○ privacyMessages not end-to-end encrypted
Direct messages are not end-to-end encrypted, and Substack personnel may access them for support, safety, or enforcement. Users should not treat Substack DMs as a secure messaging channel.
-
positive ●●●○○ termsSelf-service account deletion
You can edit some profile data and delete your account from account settings without needing to contact support. This is a practical and user-friendly control, even though some public content may persist.
-
positive ●●●○○ termsContent ownership retained
Substack expressly says original content you post remains yours. That is better than terms that claim ownership outright, even though the platform still takes a very broad license.
-
positive ●●○○○ privacyMarketing opt-out available
Substack says marketing emails are based on consent where required and can be unsubscribed from at any time. This is a basic but useful control over promotional communications.
Documents
Medium offers meaningful privacy controls and no data-sale claim, but the terms heavily favor the platform through arbitration, liability caps, broad content licensing, and significant data collection/sharing.
Medium’s legal terms are fairly standard for a publishing platform but lean moderately protective of the company. Users keep ownership of their posts, can export/delete account data, and Medium says it does not sell personal information. However, the service uses broad content licenses, extensive tracking and third-party sharing, strong liability limits, mandatory arbitration with a class-action waiver, and can change terms or suspend service with limited notice.
Points of interest
-
negative ●●●●● termsMandatory arbitration waiver
Most disputes must be handled through individual arbitration in California, and class or representative actions are waived. That can make it harder and more expensive to bring a claim, especially for small harms.
-
negative ●●●●○ termsShort claim deadline
Any dispute must be filed within one year of when the claim arose, or it is permanently barred. This is much shorter than many users would expect and can cut off claims if you wait too long.
-
negative ●●●●○ termsBroad content license
You keep ownership of your posts, but Medium receives a worldwide, royalty-free, sublicensable license to use and adapt them across its services. Practically, this allows Medium to reuse your content in ways you might not expect, though it says the license is limited to its services.
-
negative ●●●●○ privacyExtensive data collection
Medium collects account details, your posts, reading history, device identifiers, IP address, and activity data, and it also uses cookies and web beacons. This creates a fairly detailed profile of how you read and interact with the platform.
-
negative ●●●●○ termsService can change or end
Medium may stop offering the service or features, limit storage and distribution, and suspend or terminate accounts with or without notice. Users therefore have limited assurance that access or published content will remain available indefinitely.
-
positive ●●●●○ privacyNo personal info sales
Medium states it does not sell your personal information, which is a meaningful privacy benefit compared with services that monetize user data that way. It also says California users can opt out if that ever changes in the future.
-
positive ●●●●○ privacyExport and deletion tools
You can access, correct, delete, and export your account information from Settings. That gives users a practical way to retrieve their data and start closing an account without having to file a separate legal request.
-
negative ●●●○○ privacyThird-party sharing and scanning
Medium shares personal information with vendors, service providers, and other users, and says those vendors may scan and review your content, messages, AI interactions, and metadata. That means your material may be exposed beyond Medium itself for processing.
-
negative ●●●○○ privacyEmbedded content leaks data
If you interact with embedded third-party content, the third party can collect information directly from that interaction. Medium says it does not control that collection, so off-site tools like videos or embeds can create separate privacy exposure.
-
positive ●●●○○ privacyEurope rights disclosed
Medium explicitly describes GDPR-style rights for EEA, UK, and Swiss users, including access, erasure, objection, restriction, and complaint rights. It also names how to contact a regulator if issues are unresolved.
-
neutral ●●○○○ privacyAccount data deleted quickly
For EEA users, Medium says account data is deleted within 14 days after account closure, which is relatively clear. Other data may still be kept longer for legal or business reasons, so deletion is not total.
Documents
Comparison is based on each service's published Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Read the source documents linked above before relying on any specific clause.