AIgree
← back

Asana vs Figma

Side-by-side comparison of the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy of Asana and Figma.

Asana logo
Asana
Productivity
★★★☆☆
Mixed / moderately user-friendly

Asana provides meaningful privacy safeguards, certifications, data residency choices, and clear rights-request channels, which are notable positives. But the user-facing terms remain protective of Asana: the service is provided as-is, liability is capped at $100, users owe indemnity, and Asana can change terms or discontinue service with broad discretion.

Asana’s legal posture is generally business-oriented but comparatively transparent. It offers strong privacy/compliance signals, data residency options, admin controls for AI, and a clear privacy-rights request process. However, its terms include broad service-control rights, a very low liability cap, indemnity obligations, and broad discretion to change terms, suspend access, or remove content—especially important for free users and people using employer-managed accounts.

Points of interest

  • negative ●●●●● terms
    Liability capped at $100

    If Asana causes harm, its maximum contractual liability is generally limited to $100, which is very low for a productivity platform that may store important work data. It also broadly disclaims warranties.

  • negative ●●●●○ terms
    Broad indemnity obligation

    You agree to defend and reimburse Asana for claims tied to your use, content, legal violations, or others' rights. This can shift substantial legal risk and costs onto the user.

  • negative ●●●●○ terms
    Unilateral terms changes

    Asana can change the terms by posting updates, and continued use counts as acceptance. That means your rights and obligations may change without a fresh signature.

  • positive ●●●●○ privacy
    Strong privacy certifications

    Asana highlights third-party privacy and security certifications and audits, which is a meaningful trust signal for handling customer data. This suggests more mature internal controls than many consumer services provide.

  • positive ●●●●○ privacy
    Data residency options

    Customers can choose among several data regions, which can help with compliance, localization, and reducing cross-border privacy concerns. Enterprise users can also bring their own encryption keys for added control.

  • negative ●●●○○ terms
    Service may end anytime

    Asana reserves the right to modify or discontinue the service, temporarily or permanently, with or without notice. Users may have limited recourse if features are removed or access ends.

  • negative ●●●○○ terms
    Content removal discretion

    For free users, Asana can remove content it considers objectionable in its sole discretion. This gives the platform broad moderation power beyond clear legal violations.

  • negative ●●●○○ terms
    Managed users lack control

    If you use Asana through your employer or another organization, that customer controls much of your data, permissions, integrations, and disputes. Your privacy and access may depend more on your organization than on Asana directly.

  • negative ●●●○○ privacy
    AI may use content

    Some AI-powered features use metadata, personal information, and user-generated content such as task titles and descriptions. Users handling sensitive work should understand that AI processing may extend beyond metadata.

  • positive ●●●○○ privacy
    Privacy rights request form

    Asana provides a specific global form for access and deletion/privacy requests, making rights exercise more straightforward. That is more user-friendly than requiring ad hoc email requests.

  • positive ●●●○○ privacy
    Law enforcement review

    Asana says it reviews government requests for validity and proportionality before responding. This is a meaningful transparency and privacy-protective commitment.

  • positive ●●●○○ privacy
    AI can be disabled

    Admins can turn Asana AI features on or off, giving organizations meaningful control over whether AI processing happens in their workspace. This can reduce privacy and governance risks.

Documents

Figma logo
Figma
Productivity
★★★☆☆
Mixed / average user-friendliness

Figma offers meaningful positives like user ownership of content, deletion/access/portability rights, security commitments, and a relatively narrow service-use license over content. However, these are balanced by arbitration and class-action waiver terms, auto-renewal and nonrefundability, broad termination/change powers, extensive tracking and advertising disclosures, and strong liability limits.

Figma’s terms are fairly standard for a SaaS productivity tool: users keep ownership of their content, get some privacy controls and data rights, and can download content for 30 days after termination. But the legal posture includes mandatory individual arbitration unless you opt out, auto-renewing subscriptions with mostly nonrefundable fees, broad liability limits, extensive data collection, targeted advertising, and discretionary service changes or termination.

Points of interest

  • negative ●●●●● terms
    Mandatory arbitration default

    Most disputes must go to binding arbitration instead of court unless you opt out within 30 days. This also waives jury trial and usually makes claims harder to pursue publicly.

  • negative ●●●●● terms
    Class action waiver

    Users must pursue claims only on an individual basis, not as part of a class or representative action. That can reduce leverage for smaller-value disputes.

  • negative ●●●●○ terms
    Auto-renewal and no refunds

    Paid subscriptions and AI credit subscriptions renew automatically unless canceled before the term ends, and fees are generally nonrefundable. Users need to monitor renewals and seat counts closely.

  • negative ●●●●○ terms
    Low liability cap

    If something goes wrong, Figma sharply limits what users can recover, generally to indirect damages excluded and total damages capped at $100 or 12 months of fees. This can leave users undercompensated after outages or losses.

  • positive ●●●●○ terms
    You keep content ownership

    Figma says customers retain all rights in their uploaded and created content. Its rights to use that content are framed as being for operating, securing, and improving the service rather than taking ownership.

  • positive ●●●●○ terms
    Narrow content-use license

    The terms limit Figma’s use of customer content to providing and maintaining the service, including security and debugging. That is more user-protective than a broad commercial reuse license.

  • positive ●●●●○ privacy
    Access, deletion, portability rights

    Figma offers rights to access, correct, delete, restrict, object, and obtain portability of personal data, subject to applicable law. It also recognizes GPC signals for CCPA-style sale/sharing opt-outs when identifiable.

  • negative ●●●○○ terms
    Figma can change terms

    Figma may modify the terms and incorporated policies at any time, with only an effort to give advance notice for material changes. Continued use after the effective date means acceptance.

  • negative ●●●○○ terms
    Broad termination discretion

    Figma can terminate access at its sole discretion and may change or discontinue features without notice. It does promise a prorated refund in some paid-service discontinuation cases.

  • negative ●●●○○ privacy
    Targeted advertising and tracking

    The privacy policy allows third-party advertising partners to use cookies and tracking tools for interest-based advertising. This goes beyond strictly necessary service analytics.

  • positive ●●●○○ terms
    30-day post-termination download

    After termination, Figma says customer content will be available for electronic retrieval for 30 days, after which it may be deleted. This gives users a limited off-ramp to export work.

  • neutral ●●○○○ privacy
    AI training has admin control

    Figma says customer content may be used to improve AI only if content training is toggled on in admin settings, with de-identification and aggregation steps. This is better than default blanket training, but users in org accounts may not control the setting themselves.

Documents

Comparison is based on each service's published Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Read the source documents linked above before relying on any specific clause.