AIgree
← back

Mistral AI vs Midjourney

Side-by-side comparison of the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy of Mistral AI and Midjourney.

Mistral AI logo
★★★★☆
Mostly user-friendly

The documents include several consumer protections: users own outputs, can export/delete data, can object to training, have a 14-day withdrawal right, and can sue in their home-country courts. The main drawbacks are training use in some cases, long retention for certain records, auto-renewing subscriptions, and fairly broad moderation/termination powers.

Mistral AI’s terms are fairly user-oriented on ownership, withdrawal rights, and dispute venue, with some strong GDPR-style rights and export controls. At the same time, the service uses prompts, outputs, feedback, and usage data for product improvement and sometimes model training, retains some API data for 30 days and some records for years, and allows automated moderation and broad content controls.

Points of interest

  • positive ●●●●● terms
    Export and delete tools

    The service says you can export your data from your account and delete your account at any time, with a Help Center procedure for deleting data and digital assets. That makes it easier to leave and take your data with you.

  • negative ●●●●○ terms
    Auto-renewing subscriptions

    Paid subscriptions renew automatically until you cancel, so you need to actively manage billing to avoid unwanted charges. Failed payments can also lead to suspension or downgrade.

  • negative ●●●●○ privacy
    Training uses your content

    Mistral may use your input, output, and feedback to train its models in certain cases, including free subscriptions and feedback submissions. If you do not opt out where available, your prompts and outputs may help improve the model.

  • positive ●●●●○ terms
    You own outputs

    Mistral says you own your outputs, which is good if you want to reuse, publish, or commercialize what the model generates. It also says you retain ownership of your inputs.

  • positive ●●●●○ privacy
    Can object to training

    Mistral says you can object to the use of your input and output data for model training from account settings. That gives users a meaningful control over one of the most sensitive uses of their content.

  • positive ●●●●○ terms
    Home-country courts apply

    For EEA consumers, you can bring claims in the courts of your country of residence, and your home-country substantive law applies. That is more user-friendly than forcing a distant forum or foreign law.

  • negative ●●●○○ privacy
    Long retention periods

    Le Chat conversations stay until you delete them, API inputs and outputs may be kept for 30 days for abuse monitoring, and some records are retained much longer, including invoices for 10 years. That means a lot of data can persist after use.

  • negative ●●●○○ terms
    Broad moderation controls

    Mistral reserves the right to monitor usage with automated tools and to remove or restrict data that violates its rules or creates risk. This can affect availability of your content or account if the service flags it.

  • positive ●●●○○ terms
    Withdrawal right offered

    You have a 14-day withdrawal right after subscribing, and Mistral says it will refund payments within 14 days after notice. This is a standard but important consumer protection for paid plans.

  • neutral ●●○○○ terms
    Conversation links are public

    If you share a conversation link, anyone with the link can view it, and Mistral says it does not control who accesses it. This is not a hidden clause, but it is easy to overlook and has obvious privacy implications.

  • neutral ●●○○○ privacy
    No US data sale or ad sharing

    For certain U.S. residents, Mistral says it has not sold, shared, or used personal data for targeted advertising in the previous 12 months. That is a reassuring privacy statement, though it is limited to a defined period and jurisdiction.

Documents

Midjourney logo
★★☆☆☆
Company-protective

Users get some meaningful privacy rights and a clear deletion/access path, but the service combines broad content licensing, mandatory arbitration, unilateral policy changes, public-by-default sharing, and substantial data sharing/retention.

Midjourney’s legal terms are fairly standard for an AI generation service but are strongly company-protective in several areas. Users retain ownership of their creations to the extent allowed by law, yet Midjourney gets a broad, perpetual license to use inputs and outputs, defaults public sharing/remixing on, and requires binding arbitration in California. The privacy policy is more user-friendly on deletion and access rights, with clear account-based request flows and explicit non-sale language, though it still collects prompts, uploads, usage data, and shares data with advertisers and service providers.

Points of interest

  • negative ●●●●● terms
    Broad perpetual content license

    Midjourney can use, modify, sublicense, and distribute your prompts and generated assets forever, even after you leave. That means your content may be reused for service, product, or downstream purposes without additional payment or permission.

  • negative ●●●●○ terms
    Public sharing by default

    Content you post is publicly viewable and remixable unless you use the limited Stealth feature. In shared spaces like Discord, other people can still see your creations regardless of Stealth.

  • negative ●●●●○ terms
    Mandatory arbitration clause

    Disputes must go to binding arbitration in Santa Clara County, and you waive the right to a jury trial. This can make it harder and more expensive to bring claims in court.

  • negative ●●●●○ terms
    Can change terms unilaterally

    Midjourney can update the agreement and keep the service terms changing over time, with continued use treated as acceptance. If you disagree, your only real option is to stop using the service.

  • negative ●●●●○ terms
    Suspension at any time

    The company can suspend or ban access at any time and for any reason. That creates a significant account-risk if your work depends on continuous access.

  • positive ●●●●○ privacy
    No card storage stated

    Midjourney says it uses third-party processors and does not store your credit card information, only confirmation that payment was made. That reduces the amount of sensitive payment data kept directly by Midjourney.

  • negative ●●●○○ privacy
    Data shared with advertisers

    Midjourney says it may use analytics and advertising partners and advertising cookies to deliver more relevant ads. Users can opt out of certain sharing in privacy settings, but the default collection/sharing posture is still fairly broad.

  • negative ●●●○○ privacy
    Prompt and upload collection

    The service collects prompts, uploaded content, IP address, cookies, usage data, and contact details. For an AI tool, that means the things you type and upload may become part of the service’s retained personal data footprint.

  • negative ●●●○○ privacy
    Long retention for disputes

    Personal data is kept as long as needed for the stated purposes, legal compliance, disputes, and enforcement. In practice, that means information may linger well beyond account use if Midjourney decides it is needed for legal or policy reasons.

  • neutral ●●●○○ privacy
    Some deletion and access rights

    EEA, UK, Swiss, and California users have access, correction, deletion, portability, and some objection/opt-out rights. The practical upside is a usable account-based path to request account/data deletion.

  • positive ●●●○○ privacy
    Deletion via account page

    The policy gives a concrete path to delete your account and data through the account page, and says survey data can also be accessed and deleted. That makes rights requests more actionable than vague contact-only promises.

Documents

Comparison is based on each service's published Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Read the source documents linked above before relying on any specific clause.