Notion vs Trello
Side-by-side comparison of the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy of Notion and Trello.
Notion provides comparatively clear privacy disclosures, user rights, and opt-out tools, but still permits substantial tracking, ad-related data sharing that may count as a sale/share under some laws, broad workplace/org visibility, and open-ended retention. The actual service terms were not provided here, so key issues like arbitration, liability limits, refunds, and termination cannot be fully assessed.
Notion’s published legal materials here are strongest on privacy disclosures rather than contract terms. The privacy policy is fairly detailed, offers access/correction/deletion/portability rights depending on location, and includes opt-outs for cookies and ad-related sharing. But it also allows broad tracking, targeted advertising, international transfers, indefinite business-need retention, and sharing of account/workspace data with organizations and transaction partners.
Points of interest
-
negative ●●●●○ privacyAd sharing may be sale
Notion says its disclosures to advertising partners may count as a "sale" or "sharing" of personal information under applicable law. In practice, your identifiers, usage data, location, and inferences may be used for targeted advertising unless you opt out.
-
negative ●●●●○ privacyCross-device tracking allowed
Notion and its partners may connect your activity across websites, devices, or apps. That can make profiling and ad targeting more comprehensive than single-device tracking.
-
negative ●●●●○ privacyOrganization can access workspace data
If you use an employer-provisioned email or join an org workspace, Notion may share profile details and potentially workspace content with that organization. That matters if you expect a personally controlled account while using a work email.
-
positive ●●●●○ privacyAccess, deletion, portability rights
Depending on where you live, Notion offers rights to access, correct, delete, restrict processing, object, and in some cases transfer your data. These are meaningful user protections when available.
-
positive ●●●●○ privacyClear opt-out mechanisms
Notion provides unsubscribe tools, cookie settings, a "Do Not Sell or Share My Info" link, and says it recognizes legally recognized browser opt-out signals like Global Privacy Control where required. That makes privacy choices easier to exercise.
-
negative ●●●○○ privacyBroad automatic data collection
The policy permits collection of device IDs, IP, browser data, usage patterns, cookies, and inferred location, plus data from third parties and integrations. This is a fairly expansive analytics and marketing data footprint for a productivity service.
-
negative ●●●○○ privacyRetention is open-ended
Notion keeps data for as long as you use the service and as needed for disputes, audits, legal defenses, business purposes, and enforcement. The policy does not provide firm deletion timelines, so information may persist after you stop active use.
-
negative ●●●○○ privacyData transfers on business sale
Your data may be transferred or sold as part of a merger, acquisition, bankruptcy, or other asset deal. Users generally do not get an individualized choice about such transfers.
-
neutral ●●●○○ termsTerms not assessable here
The provided terms page is only a legal-document index, not the actual service contract. Important issues such as arbitration, class-action waiver, liability caps, refunds, and termination rules cannot be verified from this record.
-
positive ●●●○○ privacyNo direct card storage
Notion says payment information is stored and processed by third-party payment providers rather than directly on Notion’s services. That can reduce the amount of sensitive payment data Notion itself holds.
Documents
Atlassian offers some meaningful protections and transparency, including refund rights, security commitments, court-based dispute resolution, and a stated path to retrieve/delete customer data. However, the legal posture is still vendor-protective: subscriptions auto-renew, fees are mostly non-refundable, services are largely provided "as is," Atlassian can suspend/remove content in some cases, and liability is capped.
Trello is covered by Atlassian’s enterprise-style customer terms and privacy policy. The documents provide some user-friendly protections like a 30-day refund window, stated security commitments, data retrieval guidance, and ordinary court jurisdiction rather than arbitration. But they also include auto-renewal, broad warranty disclaimers, liability caps, suspension/removal rights, and privacy language that often places control with your employer or organization rather than with you personally.
Points of interest
-
negative ●●●●○ termsBroad suspension/removal rights
Atlassian may remove data or suspend access if it believes content violates law, policy, others’ rights, or threatens service security. It says it will give a chance to fix issues when practicable, but the power is broad.
-
negative ●●●●○ termsLiability cap applies
If something goes wrong, Atlassian’s general liability is capped at fees paid in the previous 12 months. That can significantly limit recovery for outages or losses.
-
positive ●●●●○ termsNo forced arbitration
Disputes are assigned to courts in Ireland or San Francisco rather than mandatory arbitration. That preserves a more traditional path to sue in court, though forum location may still be inconvenient.
-
positive ●●●●○ terms30-day refund window
Initial purchases can be canceled within 30 days for any reason and refunded. This is a meaningful trial-like protection compared with services that make all sales final immediately.
-
negative ●●●○○ termsAuto-renewal by default
Paid subscriptions renew automatically at then-current rates unless either side gives notice before the term ends. Users need to actively cancel to avoid continued billing.
-
negative ●●●○○ termsFees mostly non-refundable
Outside the initial return policy or certain termination cases, payments are generally not refunded. If you cancel mid-term, unpaid amounts can become immediately due.
-
negative ●●●○○ termsService largely as-is
Aside from specific warranties, the products and services are provided "as is," and Atlassian disclaims many implied warranties. This weakens user remedies for performance issues not covered by express promises.
-
positive ●●●○○ termsSecurity commitments stated
Atlassian promises to maintain an information security program and says it uses independent third-party audits and certifications. That is stronger than a purely discretionary security clause.
-
positive ●●●○○ termsData retrieval documented
The terms expressly say documentation explains how customers can retrieve their data from cloud products. That is a useful portability/exit signal, even if the details are in separate documentation.
-
negative ●●○○○ termsThird-party apps at your risk
Using Marketplace apps or other integrations can allow those providers to access your data, and Atlassian disclaims responsibility for those products. This makes due diligence on integrations important.
-
neutral ●●○○○ privacyEmployer may control data
If you use Trello through your employer or another organization, that customer controls the account and how your personal information is handled. In practice, your privacy rights may need to be exercised through your organization, not directly with Atlassian.
-
positive ●●○○○ termsChanges get advance notice
Atlassian says it will use commercially reasonable efforts to post agreement changes at least 30 days before they take effect. For many paid-plan changes, they apply at renewal, and some mid-term changes trigger a termination/refund option.
Documents
Comparison is based on each service's published Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Read the source documents linked above before relying on any specific clause.